Decline in Strait of Hormuz Ship Traffic
Ship movements through the Strait of Hormuz have significantly reduced following recent exchanges between the United States and Iran. This comes after three tankers were attacked earlier in the week, leading to heightened tensions in the region. Maritime intelligence firm Kpler reported that only 23 tankers and cargo ships traversed the strait on Wednesday, a notable drop from 47 the previous week.
The attacked vessels were navigating a route suggested by the US through Omani waters. In contrast, Iran has consistently advocated for a separate route through its waters, claiming it to be the only safe passage.
Impact on Global Trade
The Strait of Hormuz is a crucial conduit for global trade, with over a fifth of the world's oil and gas, along with other essential goods, passing through it. Before the conflict, an average of 138 ships crossed the strait daily, as per the Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC), a coalition that includes the US.
Tensions escalated after the US and Israel launched strikes on Iran on February 28, leading to Iran retaliating by targeting ships and deploying mines. The US responded by imposing a blockade on Iranian ports. A peace agreement signed on June 17 aimed to reopen the strait, with the US agreeing to lift its naval blockade and ease sanctions on Iranian oil exports. Following this, traffic initially surged to a peak of 72 ships on June 24.
Route Disputes and Recent Violence
The recent violence stems from disagreements over control of the strait. During negotiations, Iran asserted its right to manage transit and impose fees, a stance opposed by the US and its allies, who insist on maintaining free passage.
After the peace deal, Iran proposed a system of lanes near its coast, which it declared mandatory for all traffic. Iran's military reiterated this position following the latest tanker attacks. However, the JMIC recommended an alternative route through Omani waters, which saw increased traffic until further strikes occurred on June 25 and 27.
In response to these incidents, President Donald Trump condemned Iran's actions as a "foolish violation" of the truce, prompting US military strikes on Iranian targets. Iran retaliated, accusing the US of breaching the interim deal. Consequently, the number of ships using the Omani route has dwindled.
Current Shipping Conditions
The latest attacks have further reduced the number of ships using the US-endorsed Omani route. The assaulted ships included a Qatar-owned LNG tanker, a Saudi-owned crude oil tanker, and a Liberia-flagged crude tanker. As a result, the number of vessels using the Omani route has nearly stopped, with no ships recorded on Wednesday compared to an average of ten daily before the attacks.
According to Martin Kelly, a senior analyst at EOS Risk Group, these events reflect a recurring pattern of US-Iran tensions, suggesting a cycle of sporadic conflicts followed by temporary resolutions.
Details of the US-Iran Peace Agreement
The peace memorandum signed on June 17 committed Iran to ensure safe passage for commercial vessels without imposing charges for 60 days. It also included a provision for dialogue with Oman regarding future administration of the strait. However, critics argue the agreement lacks long-term commitments from Iran regarding free passage.
Concerns over sea mines laid by Iran in international shipping lanes have also impeded traffic from returning to pre-conflict levels. Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps issued a statement warning against foreign interference in determining shipping routes, threatening severe responses and disruption of reopening efforts.
US Challenges in Strait Reopening
During a NATO summit, President Trump declared the memorandum "over" but indicated ongoing negotiations with Iran. Iran, in turn, accused the US of violating the agreement by revoking a temporary easing of oil export sanctions.
Jennifer Parker, a maritime security expert, suggests that the US must recalibrate its strategy, as economic incentives and military threats have not altered Iran's approach. The challenge lies in balancing diplomatic and military measures effectively.
Source: Original Article
